So today Tiger Woods held the first press conference to address the affairs which fractured his marriage. His public statement can even be found front and centre on the official Tiger Woods website. There were only a handful of people present at the TPC Sawgrass Clubhouse in Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida, and even a more scrupulously chosen representation from the media.
My dad was watching the Special Report on Sports Net that showed the public statement. I didn’t know this, but apparently Tiger Woods made every effort to hide from the media for three months. I asked my dad what he thought, and he said that he would also have hid from the public eye. Keep the private life private. Protect the family. My dad also felt that Tiger Woods’ statement was sincere.
When it comes to celebrity lives, I’m not very concerned with keeping watch, so I don’t know how much we can read into one statement made in one evening by this legendary golfer. But I do agree with my dad that Tiger Woods appeared quite penitant – and to that end I think it’s right and courageous of him to come out of hiding and clear things up. I’m thinking about high-profile people like Bill Clinton who also made a public apology for his behaviour. Not only does it help to heal their professional profiles, but there is something good about trying to clear one’s conscience and step into accountability.
As an aspiring journalist, I wonder how I would have approached this current event. In one way, I am not really interested in scouring the news to find commentary on his apology because I don’t like to pry and even less so when the subject matter is sensitive. So I empathize with his penitant effort – but how would an empathetic journalist interview well? As someone who values time alone thinking things through, I’d consider what he’s included in his statement:
As I proceed, I understand people have questions. I understand the press wants to ask me for the details and the times I was unfaithful. I understand people want to know whether Elin and I will remain together. Please know that as far as I’m concerned, every one of these questions and answers is a matter between Elin and me. These are issues between a husband and a wife.
If I had to do my job and interview Tiger Woods, I’d ask how he plans to manage media attention in light of his clear intention to work through “these questions and answers” in the privacy between a husband and wife. Will he go back into hiding? How will his absence affect his public profile, especially when he intends to return to professional golf later on?
I think there’s a misunderstanding about journalists that we really want to dig out all this dirt about people. But two great interviewers and journalists who taught my class in Ryerson were also very empathetic people who looked into who they were interviewing, rather than looked for the story they could draw out. Journalists are known to be story tellers, but what’s important for me to remember is that the people involved are created in God’s image. So if story telling is more like gossiping and splashing the hearts and guts of the one interviewed, then I think that says something about the integrity of the journalist.
I’m just thinking aloud here. And I think the funny thing about our jobs – be it golfer or politician or journalist – is that integrity is not exempt from those professional areas. That just might be a circular way to talk about integrity itself, but when the rubber hits the road, it’s time to practise what you preach.